Built for different jobs

Every statement about another product on these pages comes from its publisher’s own documentation or a published paper, and links to the source. Where another tool is the better fit for a question, the page says so.

At a glance

BlockSimExtendSimReliaSim
Built forReliability engineering: RAM, fault trees, maintenanceGeneral-purpose simulation toolkitHigh-speed production lines
Simulation methodExact analytical methods or discrete event simulation, on a reliability block diagramMulti-method: discrete event, discrete rate, continuous, RBDDiscrete rate, with per-failure-mode reliability
Where ReliaSim differsDiscrete rate line flow (buffers, blocking and starving, rate changes) vs discrete event simulation on a reliability diagramSame discrete rate plus reliability model, purpose-built, independently validated, and 1,200× faster on the published WSC 2020 model—

Sources: ReliaSoft’s Intro to BlockSim; Fischel & Lange, WSC 2020. For the validation and timing, see ReliaSim vs ExtendSim.

Read a comparison

How to choose

Start from the question, not the tool. The “Built for” row above gives the short answer. Whichever you choose, the model is only as good as its per-failure-mode time-to-failure and time-to-repair data and its validation against the line’s history.

Related reading

Try a discrete rate line model

The bottling-line models in the ReliaSim Sandbox’s Lines tier come with the engine’s saved results, and you don’t need to sign up.

Open the Sandbox →

Weighing tools for your own line? Schedule a call.