Industry

Simulation for Chemicals, Oil & Gas
The Case Rate-Based Simulation Was Built For

Most simulation software models a queue of parts. A chemical plant has no parts. It has material moving at a rate through reactors, tanks and pipes, in campaigns that change grade and in batches that can't be interrupted. Rate-based simulation was created for this, and in this industry the difference in approach matters more than anywhere else.

Why entity models struggle here

To model bulk material as discrete entities you have to chop it into pseudo-parts. Make them small and the model runs too slowly to explore anything. Make them large and the answer is too coarse to act on. The alternative, a combined discrete/continuous language, means writing differential equations, which puts the model out of reach of the people who understand the plant.

Rate-based simulation represents flow as flow and fires events only when a rate changes. So a full year of a plant runs in under a second, and a thousand scenarios take an afternoon rather than a project.

What tends to be binding

Intermediate storage between production and packaging

Bulk production and packaging rarely want to keep the same time. When packaging has to take output as it's made, neither can be scheduled on its own terms. Sizing the store between them is a capital question with a scheduling answer. The gain from decoupling is often larger than the gain from buying more of the constrained stage.

Campaign scheduling and grade changes

Changeovers between grades carry cleaning, purge and off-spec cost, so campaign length trades directly against inventory and responsiveness. Move the product mix and the binding constraint can move with it, which defeats a schedule optimized against a fixed bottleneck.

Tank farms and shared vessels

Shared intermediate capacity couples processes that look independent on a flowsheet. A vessel committed to one campaign is unavailable to another, and the interaction only shows up over time.

Capital against overtime

The recurring question is whether to buy equipment or run the existing plant harder. Answering it needs the time split (production, repair, changeover, idle, overtime) under demand that varies, including the periods when demand exceeds capacity.

Each of these is a dynamic interaction rather than a rate calculation. A plant balanced on paper can be badly unbalanced in operation, and the difference comes from how the stages couple to one another over time.

Who has used it

Rohm & Haas · ICI Paints · Glidden · Elf AtoChem · BICC General Cable

Chemicals work on this site

Adjacent work

The method has also been applied to resource and logistics problems in this sector and in government. Examples include long-horizon transport and storage planning for Department of Energy waste programs, and facility-maintenance resource modeling used to build long-term service contract proposals. Those are network and resource studies rather than production-line studies, but the treatment of flow is the same.

A free line assessment, this fall

Bring one question about your line. We model it on your own data and send back a two-page readout in about five business days.

Apply for a free line assessment →

Or explore the Sandbox first, with no sign-up.